Skip to content
CaliberPath
Sponsored assessment seats

See the bench. Never the individuals.

Sponsor Caliber Profile seats for a cohort — the same instrument and report depth your people would buy themselves — and receive the aggregate competency picture your leadership can act on.

Book a conversation Per-seat, per tier · contact for cohort pricing · see pricing
Which instrument answers your question

Team Assessment or the Diagnostic? Different questions.

Team Assessment measures individuals.

Each person's competency profile — forty-five behavioral competencies plus their sector's technical dimension — on sponsored seats. It answers: where does each person on this team stand, and what should each develop?

The Organizational Caliber Diagnostic measures the organization.

L&D maturity across six dimensions, through leadership and staff cohorts, with the perception gap as the signature finding. It answers: how mature is our development system, and where do leadership and staff see it differently?

Complementary, not substitutes — one profiles the people, the other diagnoses the system. When the question is systemic, start with the Diagnostic; when the question is individual capability across a known team, start here. Choosing one does not preclude the other.

What you receive

The aggregate insight, shown before you buy it.

Below is the shape of the organizational deliverable — a cohort's competency distribution, never an individual's results. Expectations set at consideration, not negotiated at delivery.

Synthetic specimen — no real cohort data Illustrative cohort · n = 24

Cohort competency distribution by domain

Self-Mastery Strongest domain
Professionalism Broadly solid
Leadership & Influence The thin bench
At or above working proficiency Approaching Development priority
Why it's shaped this way

Aggregation thresholds preclude re-identification — the deliverable is generated as a separate, firewalled artifact, never a live dashboard over individual records.

Where the bench is strong, where it's thin, and what to build — the aggregate picture your leadership uses to plan development, sequence cohorts, and shape curricula.

The confidentiality firewall is a feature, not fine print.

No report, view, or export shows an individual's results to the organization — structurally, not just by policy. Your people see this stated at intake and in their sponsorship banner, because honest self-assessment depends on trusting it. You see completion status; they keep their results; you receive the aggregate. The Diagnostic carries the same discipline in its own form: staff responses aggregate to cohort-level views only, and no individual maturity placement ever reaches the sponsor.

Seats issued

Your cohort receives sponsored access — same instrument, same report depth as self-pay.

Individuals assess

Each person completes on their own time; you track completion status only — never content.

Aggregate close-out

The firewalled organizational deliverable arrives — and the renewal conversation naturally attaches to it.

Where this fits
Model & Assess
Competency ModelingTeam Assessment — you are here
Coach

The natural pilot: one team's cohort.

Book a conversation